ROUTE DIRECTORY / STATIC LIST

Global routes directory

KdVPN currently covers 110+ countries / 190+ routes. This page organizes representative entry points by region, city, and route type to help you choose a destination and path before connecting.

No device limit 60-day money-back guarantee No email address required Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux

ROUTE INDEX / REGION

Regional routes list

The table below lists representative entry points across different regions. Countries and cities indicate the exit region, while route types describe the primary path from the local network to the destination. A streaming mark means the entry point is a candidate route for that access scenario; it does not guarantee content licensing, catalog availability, or unchanged platform policies.

Country / region City Route type Streaming
Asia-Pacific
Hong Kong Hong Kong IEPL Supported
Singapore Singapore Relay Supported
Japan Tokyo IEPL Supported
Japan Osaka Relay Supported
Taiwan, China Taipei Direct Supported
South Korea Seoul Direct Choose by platform
Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Direct Choose by platform
North America
United States Los Angeles IEPL Supported
United States San Jose Relay Supported
United States Seattle Direct Choose by platform
Canada Toronto Direct Supported
Canada Vancouver Relay Choose by platform
Europe
United Kingdom London IEPL Supported
Germany Frankfurt Relay Supported
Netherlands Amsterdam Direct Choose by platform
France Paris Direct Supported
Switzerland Zurich Direct Choose by platform
Other regions
Australia Sydney IEPL Supported
New Zealand Auckland Direct Choose by platform
United Arab Emirates Dubai Relay Choose by platform

When choosing a route, do not treat the city name as the only deciding factor. Different cities in the same country may connect through different carriers, relay entry points, or destination networks. Start by choosing a country or region based on your use case, then compare candidate routes in the same area within the client. This is usually more useful for troubleshooting than relying on one entry point indefinitely.

ROUTE CLASS / PATH

Route types explained

IEPL, relay, and direct connections describe how routes are organized, not a simple quality ranking. Each type involves different trade-offs in path control, connection steps, resource costs, and suitable use cases.

PATH / IEPL

IEPL

IEPL routes use more controllable dedicated paths for key sections of the cross-border connection, reducing unpredictable forwarding across the public internet. They are better suited to sustained office work, long meetings, large file transfers, and tasks sensitive to connection fluctuations. Here, “dedicated” describes the route type and does not mean bandwidth is exclusively assigned to an individual account.

These routes require more network resources and scheduling effort, so they are generally prioritized for destinations where continuity matters more. If the local network has wireless interference, device power-saving limits, or paused background apps, switching to an IEPL path cannot replace local troubleshooting.

PATH / RELAY

Relay connections

A relay connection first sends traffic to a suitable entry point, which then forwards it to the target region. Scheduling focuses on avoiding unfavorable inter-network combinations while balancing coverage and resource costs. Relay routes work well for web browsing, streaming, AI Tools, and most everyday cross-border access tasks.

A relay route is not necessarily slower. If a direct path crosses several unstable public-network interconnections, a relay may be steadier. However, relaying adds a scheduling step, so the entry point and the local link to it also affect the final experience. Choose based on whether the target service remains usable over time.

PATH / DIRECT

Direct connections

A direct connection goes from the local network to the service entry point in the target region. Its path is relatively straightforward, making it suitable for everyday browsing, quick lookups, software updates, and situations where the local carrier has favorable interconnection with the destination network. Its resource arrangement is more direct, and coverage can be expanded across more cities.

Direct performance is more susceptible to public-route changes, inter-network congestion, and access times. If pages load intermittently, long sessions disconnect, or video buffers, do not repeatedly reconnect to the same city. Try a relay or IEPL route in the same region to determine whether the issue comes from the current path.

DECISION RULE Choose the destination region before the route type

The country or region determines the exit location, while the route type determines how traffic gets there. Separating these decisions helps you avoid focusing only on labels such as “IEPL” or “direct” while overlooking the actual access target.

USE CASE / DISPATCH

Choose international routes by use case

It is difficult for one route to be the right permanent choice for every task. A more reliable approach is to define the task first: which service you need, how long the session will last, whether it involves real-time interaction, and whether the exit region must remain fixed. Then narrow down the route options.

CASE / WEB

Everyday browsing

For web browsing, research, and short tasks, start with a geographically nearby route that uses fewer connection steps. Direct and relay routes can both be starting points. If the first page loads normally but later navigation stalls, keep the destination region unchanged and switch only the route type to reduce variables.

Everyday browsing usually does not require the exit to stay in the same city long term. Unless the target service has a specific regional requirement, prefer an entry point in the same area instead of adding unnecessary path length for a more distant city.

CASE / MEDIA

Streaming

Choose the country based on where the content is available, then check the streaming support mark in the table. Keep the same route after playback begins and avoid changing the exit during playback. If the platform opens but playback is unstable, try switching from direct to relay or IEPL within the same country.

Streaming catalogs, subtitles, and content rights are managed by platforms by region. Route support only means that the entry point is a candidate path. Account region, content permissions, device app version, and the platform’s own policies still need to be checked separately.

CASE / AI

AI Tools

AI Tools depend on session continuity for sign-in, long conversations, file uploads, and result generation. Prefer a region where the service is explicitly available, and keep the exit region stable throughout a work session. Relay routes suit general questions and browser use; for longer tasks, compare an IEPL route as well.

If sign-in works but a long conversation is interrupted, first check whether the exit region changed, then check whether the operating system paused the client in the background. Do not change the route, browser, and account settings at the same time, or it will be difficult to identify what caused the change.

CASE / GAME

Gaming

Gaming depends more on continuous transmission, route jitter, and packet loss than on whether a destination city is popular. Start with an entry point in the same region as the game server, then try both direct and relay routes. Sign-in, matchmaking, and gameplay may use different services, so reaching the account page does not mean the gameplay path is suitable.

Do not switch routes after a match begins. If the issue occurs only at certain times, record the region and route type in use, then compare another route type in the same region next time instead of trying multiple countries at random.

CASE / WORK

Remote work

Meetings, collaborative documents, code repositories, and business applications often require long-lived connections. Prefer the region where the target service is located and minimize route changes during work. Relay routes suit routine office work, while IEPL is better for sustained uploads, real-time collaboration, or long sessions.

If a business system uses exit-region access rules, confirm the required region before signing in and keep it consistent throughout the session. Compare routes after the work is complete rather than changing the exit location during a sensitive operation.

CHANGE CONTROL / CHECKLIST

Route switching checklist

The goal of route switching is not random trial and error. It is to identify, with as few variables as possible, whether the issue lies with the local network, route type, destination region, or a specific application. Following a sequence makes the findings easier to reuse.

  1. Confirm the destination region

    First check which countries or regions the target service supports, then choose the corresponding area from the route table. If the service has no regional requirement, start with a nearby region. At this stage, define only the exit range; do not compare every city yet.

  2. Keep one test task

    Choose a task that can be reproduced consistently, such as opening the same page, signing in to the same service, or playing the same content. Change only the route each time; do not also clear app data, modify system networking, or switch devices.

  3. Switch within the same region first

    When the current route is unsuitable, first switch the city or route type within the same country or region. This keeps the exit-region condition constant while comparing path differences, and avoids prompting the target service to reconfirm a session because the region changes repeatedly.

  4. Reconnect the application

    After switching, close the existing task and reopen it so the new connection uses the current route. An established long-lived connection may continue using the old session; seeing that the client switched is not enough to confirm that the application connection was updated.

  5. Record the region and type

    Once you find an entry point that suits the current task, record the country, city, and route type. For the same scenario later, start with these conditions and adjust based on the candidate routes available in the client at that time.

COVERAGE / READING GUIDE

How to read global coverage

KdVPN coverage currently stands at 110+ countries / 190+ routes. The country count represents the range of available exit regions, while the route count represents the total number of cities, paths, or scheduling entry points. The two figures answer different questions.

110+ countries covered
190+ route entry points

More coverage does not mean you should always choose a farther location

Broad country coverage is designed to support different websites, applications, content regions, and work destinations. For everyday use, choose the relevant country when the target region is clear. When it is not, start with a geographically nearby area to establish a clearer comparison baseline.

The same country may offer different cities and route types to accommodate changes in local-carrier interconnection, destination networks, and access times. The value of more routes is to provide alternatives, not to require users to test each one. Filter in the order of region, type, and application to narrow the candidates.

The client supports Windows / macOS / iOS / Android / Linux with no limit on simultaneous devices. Choose routes by purpose on each device, but keep the exit region as stable as possible within one work session. No email address is required to create an account; use a username and password to access the dashboard and obtain subscriptions and clients.

Hong Kong Singapore Japan United States Canada United Kingdom Germany France Australia United Arab Emirates
Start Free